Articole de la același autor Koen LENAERTS
Președintele Curţii de Justiţie a Uniunii Europene și profesor de dreptul Uniunii Europene, Universitatea din Leuven. Koen Lenaerts deține un doctorat în drept obținut la Universitatea Catolică din Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven), cu o lucrare comparativă care analizează jurisprudența constituțională a Curții de Justiție a Uniunii Europene și a Curții Supreme a Statelor Unite. De asemenea, are un Master în Drept și un Master în Administrație Publică obținute la Universitatea Harvard. Anterior, a fost profesor invitat de drept la Universitatea Harvard (1988-1989), unde a predat cursuri despre Dreptul European, și profesor la Colegiul Europei din Bruges, Belgia (1984-1989).
Autonomia dreptului Uniunii Europene
Numărul 1 Anul 2021
Numărul 1 Anul 2021
The autonomy of EU law is governed by two different, albeit intertwined, dynamics. Negatively, autonomy seeks to defi ne what EU law is not, i.e it is not ordinary international law. Positively, autonomy seeks to define what EU law is, i.e. an autonomous legal order that has the capacity to operate as a self-sufficient system of norms. That said, it is submitted that the concept of autonomy of EU law in no way conveys the message th...
Citește mai mult
Noi orizonturi pentru supremația dreptului în Uniunea Europeană
Numărul 4 Anul 2020
Numărul 4 Anul 2020
The purpose of this article is to argue that „integration through the rule of law” defines what the European Union stands for. The European integration can only take place when both the EU institutions and the Member States respect the „rules of the game.” This means, in essence, that both EU and national authorities are committed to the idea that courts – acting as independent umpires – have the final say on the question of whether...
Citește mai mult
Curtea de Justiție și instanțele judecătorești naționale: un dialog întemeiat pe încredere reciprocă și pe independența sistemului judiciar
Numărul 3 Anul 2020
Numărul 3 Anul 2020
The paper explores the relationship between judicial dialogue, mutual trust and independence within the EU legal order. That relationship is governed by mutually-reinforcing dynamics, as there can only be an effective judicial dialogue between the European Court of Justice (the ‘ECJ’) and national courts, as well as between courts of different Member States, where those courts trust each other, and in order for those courts to trus...
Citește mai mult
Uniunea Europeană – un sistem bazat pe drept care contribuie la pacea și stabilitatea internațională
Numărul 2 Anul 2020
Numărul 2 Anul 2020
The present piece supports the view that respect for the rule of law and peace go hand in hand. The first part argues that the European Union has made it possible for disputes between different actors in the decision-making process to be resolved in accordance with the law (as European integration means not only ‘integration through law’, but above all – and more importantly – ‘integration through the rule of law’). The second part ...
Citește mai mult
Modernizarea comerțului cu menținerea cadrului constituțional al Uniunii Europene: o perspectivă asupra abordării echilibrate urmate în Avizul 1/17
Numărul 1 Anul 2020
Numărul 1 Anul 2020
The Court of Justice of the European Union decided in the Opinion 1/17 that the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanism (ISDS) in Chapter 8 of the CETA is compatible with EU primary law. That landmark Opinion clarifies the concept of ‘autonomous legal order’, which is essential in the law of EU external relations, and contains important guidance on how other fundamental principles of EU law apply in new-generation trade and inve...
Citește mai mult
Limite impuse limitărilor: substanța drepturilor fundamentale în Uniunea Europeană*
Numărul 4 Anul 2019
Numărul 4 Anul 2019
The concept of the essence of a fundamental right – set out in Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the „Charter”) – operates as a constant reminder that our core values as Europeans are absolute. In other words, they are not up for balancing. As the seminal judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the „CJEU”) in Schrems shows, where a measure imposes a limitation on the exercise o...
Citește mai mult
Judecătorul Uniunii Europene într-o Europă a conformării
Numărul 3 Anul 2019
Numărul 3 Anul 2019
The article sheds light on the issues of compliance and development of the legal order of the European Union and provides some examples related to compliance in European Union law.
Following the description of the general framework, the particular role played by European Union Courts in „the Europe of compliance” is examined. The relationship between compliance and the development of the legal order of the European ...
Citește mai mult
Constituțiile naționale și dreptul Uniunii Europene – interacțiuni la intersecția pluralismului constituțional cu adeziunea la valori comune
Numărul 2 Anul 2019
Numărul 2 Anul 2019
The present contribution examines various issues of the dynamic and complex relationship between national constitutions of the Member States and European Union law, relying on examples drawn from the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Ke...
Citește mai mult
CEDO și CJUE: Crearea de sinergii în domeniul protecției drepturilor fundamentale*
Numărul 3 Anul 2018
Numărul 3 Anul 2018
The text explores the highly influential role that the European Convention on Human Rights, as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights, has played, and continues to play, in the EU legal order. In so doing, it is stressed the fact that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, despite its relative youth, has, in turn, influenced the interpretation of the Convention. That mutual influence has the potential to...
Citește mai mult
Rolul constituțiilor naționale în dreptul Uniunii Europene. De la valori comune la încredere reciprocă și dialog constructiv
Numărul 2 Anul 2018
Numărul 2 Anul 2018
The present text explores various aspects of the dynamic relationship between national constitutions and constitutionalism on the one hand, and European Union law on the other hand, having as a starting point of the reasoning the fact that national constitutions are fundamental, and indeed indispensable, in a Union between States. It is flawed to oppose national constitutionalism to the emergence and development of the EU legal – an...
Citește mai mult
Follow
© 2025 Wolters Kluwer