Arhiva

Pagina 3 din 3

Denegarea de dreptate în contextul (ne)aplicării dreptului Uniunii Europene. O analiză a cauzei Spasov împotriva României sau despre contribuția Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului la aplicarea dreptului Uniunii Europene

Anamaria GROZA

Numărul 1 Anul 2023

The European Court of Human Rights does not have powers that would allow it to interpret and apply European Union law, nor an institutional framework that would facilitate its dialogue with the Court of Justice of the European Union, similar to the one implemented by Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. However, the Judgment in Spasov is the step that the European Court of Human Rights takes in the direction of ...

Viitorul Uniunii și pentru Uniune: Câteva reflecții după Brexit

Robert SCHÜTZE

Numărul 1 Anul 2023

If Brexit was the defining “constitutional moment” for the European Union in the second part of the last decade, what are the constitutional changes awaiting the Union, say, the next ten years? This article looks at this – speculative – question by exploring the Union’s potential future evolution alongside two dimensions: a horizontal dimension focusing on the widening or narrowing of its membership, and a vertical dimension exploring the deep...

Trimiteri preliminare în fața Tribunalului Uniunii Europene. Ultima frontieră a reformării sistemului jurisdicțional al Uniunii Europene?

Sara IGLESIAS SÁNCHEZ

Numărul 1 Anul 2023

In December 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union made a request to the EU legislators to amend the provisions of its Statute in order to entrust the General Court with the adjudication of some preliminary rulings. The present article explores the main lines of the proposal in the broader framework of possible avenues for reform of the EU judicial system.

Viitorul trimiterilor preliminare în sistemul jurisdicțional al Uniunii Europene

Chiara AMALFITANO

Numărul 1 Anul 2023

The article reflects on the request submitted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, with a view to amend its Statute transferring to the General Court the jurisdiction to hear and determine questions referred for a preliminary ruling in specific areas laid down by the Statute.

Trimiteri preliminare și actul clar: instanțe naționale, avocatul general și Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene

Prof. univ. dr. Paul CRAIG

Numărul 1 Anul 2023

The regime of preliminary rulings is central to the judicial architecture of the EU. National courts of final resort have a duty to refer to the CJEU when a decision on a question of EU law raised is necessary for the resolution of the case before it. The exceptions to this duty are closely circumscribed. This article considers the inter-relationship of the Advocate General and the Court of Justice in delineating the nature of this duty and t...

Curtea de Justiție a Uniunii Europene și independența judiciară

Koen LENAERTS

Numărul 1 Anul 2023

The article aims to provide a clear and convincing answer to several questions that have been a permanent topic of discussion since the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in case of „Portuguese judges” in 2018. If the constitutions of the member states guarantee the independence of the judiciary, is there also a need for special protection afforded by European Union law? What justification does such supranational protection have? And if ...

Pagina 3 din 3

Inapoi

Ordonează după

Anul

Numarul

Autor

Cuvinte cheie

Arhiva

INFO

Follow